| Introduction Page
Basic House Information
Red House Works Page 1
Red Movement
Latest Info Page
Red House Contact Page
Trusted Links
Guest Book Page
Red House Images
RECRUITMENT PAGE
Latest House Work
|
|
|
The Latest Work From the Red House
This Latest Work is as yet incomplete but with the intent to complete a section a day, we beleive that within a week we shall have the full work up and running.
Note Work Owned By Red House.
(c) Administrator
|
|
|
“To create an ideology for the communities we must first define the terms that population live by in context of the population,”
Over a long deep discussion with my two closest colleagues of the House, we arrived at a number of mental styles in which to cross, some were small, and other gargantuous, but believe me when I say we have crossed them for you.
In order to create we have to define what is:
i) Morally Right and Wrong
ii) Happiness/Individualism
iii) Safety
iv) Contribution to community
v) Religion without offending those of different belief.
vi) Fear
vii) Control
viii) Others
A) Morally Right and Wrong.
We suppose what is right & wrong is defined by two major factors, one being the root of nearly all of our problems, sensations, and the other being the influence of environment.
Sensations, as we know range from the explainable, taste dislikes & likes, to the supposedly unexplainable, being love and attraction. From the very day you leave the womb and enter the infinite, you are presented with sensations, sensations good and sensations bad. As we grow we learn that we have to work for sensations as the sensations become more expensive. If a sensation is bad we instinctively define it as wrong for it to be brought on ourselves, that it would be wrong for others to give this to us, and with that we work in equals, and would not give the sensation to others without reason*. So if wrong is to give bad sensations and we are aware of this then why does it occur? It occurs due to greed for sensation-good. If a man had the recourses to exchange them for better sensations, then he would obtain them through trade. But what if he had no goods and was intent on attaining higher-level sensations?
Simple, he would commit acts on others for his greed.
So Greed is the root of the morally right and wrong. But if exposure to the greed were avoided then theoretically the child would grow up to be a moral person. But even with the most zealous of parents, that child can be exposed to the greed, violence or any sub section related with what is defined as wrong.
This is the Influence at work. Influence all stems from the greed for sensation.
If a child’s parents were to break present laws for easier living, drugs, sex etc. then the child would be exposed to this and ultimately inherit some of his/her parents traits. But are the parents in the wrong? Technically yes as they have a choice to bring up the child as morally right. But as one is to gather, the parents are most likely to have had parents of that caliber. With this in mind it is more than possible to continue down the generations and never find a cause. However the cause can happen anytime, as the cause is the ever-present evil, ‘GREED’ and so we can quite easily go around and around in circles never finding a direct beginning to the problem.
The circle must therefore be broken not at one joint but at both, broken at greed and broken at the parental problems.
Logically, if the child has parents who fully care for their offspring, and if the greed was countered from the very beginning then it is quite possible to see that a human being can be perfect in morals and ideas.
B) Happiness and Individualism.
How can one describe the state of happy? If happiness consists of what being safe then we should really adjoin this section to the next but if happiness can again be linked primarily to sensations of the good type and also what is known as one of the seven deadly sins, jealousy. Firstly we look at the idea of ‘good sensations’ as we have already described, the evasion of bad sensations and the attainment of good sensations is paramount to the human desire. With the idea that one person could have more sensations than another, the outcome is one of unfairness. With this in mind we can progress further to associate this with jealousy. This reaction can prompt further action such to say that to cure this rage, the person afflicted with jealousy must rid themselves of the ‘sin’. This can be achieved in many ways, but in most cases the most heard of method is that of creating fairness among the two involved.
To say in general that happiness in the result of good sensations, then how do we account for the happiness that achieved through the berating of another person?
Perhaps this is because society has come to accept that these things do happen.
C) Safety
The idea of safety among the masses is that of the room to experience good sensations without the possible deprivation of them. This covers financial safety, i.e. the prevention of ending up on streets due lacking of money. BUT lacking money is the lacking of better sensations or as it could be said, ‘upper necessities’ so surely this would in turn result in lesser sensations or the same sensations in an environment where the safety is jeopardized. Of course it is required that one is safe from death, as at that point no sensations can be experienced as is obvious.
Safety is to be therefore defined as the knowledge that good sensations can be experienced without the possibility of their loss of sensations, or loss of life.
D) Contribution to the Community
For a community to work then as in a well-oiled machine, all parts must be functioning at an optimum rate and reliability. This section will cover how rate of contribution will affect the workings of the community, the equilibrium of the community, and the threats from within the community.
1) The rate of contribution within a community
Each member of the society should within his or her own physical and mental boundaries, contribute a set amount to the community in order for it to work correctly. Of course this is all dependant on the community size where in a small community there is a lesser need for mass contribution but a greater need for general contribution
Contribution to the community also bears the problems of standard community now, and that is making room for the deviators, people the likes of which are mentally unstable could undermine the community. Though much of this has been brought to people’s attention through ‘tagging’, for example throughout the middle ages there was no such thing as mental disorders, only madness.
2) The Equilibrium of the community
This subject is a little harder to monitor than previous topics. To maintain any other aspect within a community there needs to be equilibrium among those living within. For example an unbalanced measure of the young from the old leaves a community at either immediate problems or problems gestating in the youth. With a greater concentration of youth, there is will not be enough contribution to keep the community functioning adequately. This can be shown very easily when a fully grown and physically adept man can giver greater output in terms of work than four children put together. Of course this will sort itself out eventually when the youth grow older and thus becoming adept to the situations that require physical hardiness. Only one other problem remains that being of youth mutiny. Youth Mutiny would be where the greater concentration of youth would not literally mutiny but with an inadequate amount of adults to regulate their children’s activities, the lesser experienced children who naturally would be driven by such instincts that could produce a different view on life altogether. The consequences are obvious.
With a higher concentration of the old in relation to youth, the problems would arise when the old would become decrepit and require aid from the youth. Along with the required output from the youth in aid of the old, they would also have to sustain themselves. The combination of the two workloads on the youth would cause a decline in the youth population by means of exhaustion and the desire to leave the community to relieve the pressure imposed upon them.
With a maintained equilibrium, neither such situations should occur. The second situation would be monitored with greater intensity than the first, as the first can be rectified through its own time path.
Problems faced would be such as birth control, the abortion laws and euthanasia. These will be tackled later.
E) Religion without offending those of different belief.
Religious indifference is at the heart of most strife in the global picture as we already know,
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
